On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:58:36PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > However, tla was the GNU implementation of Arch. Since it is no longer > maintained and Bazaar 1.x is regarded as its continuation, then maybe > Bazaar 1.x should officially become part of the GNU Project and be > referred to as the only maintained Arch (1.x) implementation?
You may not know this, but the next major bazaar is actively being worked on (you can research it at http://bazaar-ng.org). This would lead to a rather awkward situation. The day may come in which the community needs to have a serious discussion about whether or not to turn bazaar into a gnu project. Today, though, its probably a bit premature. > Admittedly, that wouldn't make any difference technically. But it would > bind an actively developed and used implementation to the name "GNU > Arch". > > Thanks, > Ludovic. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ -- James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
