> > Ludovic Court?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm wondering about the future of GNU Arch users. I've been using tla > >> for a year or so and I've always considered it a good tool, even today. > >> However, it seems that many (most?) people on this list don't consider > >> tla/baz as valuable tools anymore and are considering moving to GIT or > >> Bazaar 2 ASAP (which is, IMO, quite a radical change). > > > > I really like the Arch dumb server model and append-only, orthogonal > > storage/changeset format, and that's why I'm sticking with baz/tla 1.x > > for the forseeable future. > > I also like the dumb server of Arch. > > Which new systems do also have that feature?
bzr certainly does the dumb server model. :) The filesystem isn't append-only though. This is a bit of a drawback for flash devices, but a win overall (you should see the tapdancing that arch has to go through to make that work). If you're willing to trade away append-only then you can get a much, much better storage & syncing system. Bazaar-2 doesn't have all of the things you'd expect from a revision control system quite yet. However, its good enough that its bootstrapped and is also good enough for projects that can ensure single committers. -- James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
