Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Blackwell) writes:
> Anybody that considers continuing the tla and/or baz code base should bear > in mind that the two teams that were working on the codebases decided to > go for full rewrites. Well, anybody looking for a version control system should bear in mind that there have been so many GNU Arch enthusiasts, and so many developers eager to contribute to it during years, that it /can't/ be a bad VCS. Or am I missing something? ;-) To me it looks like Monotone and especially GIT exacerbated the competition among VCS projects, and also paved the way for a new, better, storage model. I have the impression that _these_ are the main reasons for the two full rewrites. Additionally, I don't think a better storage model necessarily makes a better VCS. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
