On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 13:25:31 +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: > Hi, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Blackwell) writes: > > > Anybody that considers continuing the tla and/or baz code base should bear > > in mind that the two teams that were working on the codebases decided to > > go for full rewrites. > > Well, anybody looking for a version control system should bear in mind > that there have been so many GNU Arch enthusiasts, and so many > developers eager to contribute to it during years, that it /can't/ be a > bad VCS. Or am I missing something? ;-) > > To me it looks like Monotone and especially GIT exacerbated the > competition among VCS projects, and also paved the way for a new, > better, storage model. I have the impression that _these_ are the main > reasons for the two full rewrites. > > Additionally, I don't think a better storage model necessarily makes a > better VCS.
It's not (just) a storage model. It is a better model for the relation
between files and revisions.
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
