On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:49:16AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >>> But I do not want this to become one of those nice warm flames, so can >>> we stop the crap about history, and find someone who wishes to be the >>> maintainer for tla?
>> I'm guessing you've missed a lot of posts in the 6-2 month ago range. >> Pleaes read those (particularly the ones by Tom) on why nobody's >> seriously considering maintaining tla. > I have read the more or less all posts on this list, and for the record: > I'm seriously considering it, since I think a VCS for the GNU project is > immensly important. But I simply do not have the time to maintain yet > another project, so it would be unfair to the users. I think you misunderstand me. I'm not suggesting that arch be killed off. I'm suggesting that if you wish to continue arch development, then revc is a better target than tla. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
