I think you misunderstand me. I'm not suggesting that arch be killed off. I'm suggesting that if you wish to continue arch development, then revc is a better target than tla.
I was only interested in maintaining the current code base of tla. I atleast would be totally unsuitable for development of further versions of arch. I see development and maintaing as two different task, often the maintainer is also the lead developer, but not always. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
