Look, the patch is still under discussion. I am not ignoring the opinions of everyone, especially not Tom. The patch is not accepted yet; I indicated that I want the opinions of people. The current majority opinion does not favor the patch in the current form; and anything Tom does not like would be considered twice, if not three times or more.
Andy --- "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> "Derek" == Derek Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Derek> Addressing Matthieu's concern. Now it prints a warning > Derek> message. Also does a rename before the rm. > > *sigh* Another good project succumbs to CADT syndrome. Now even tla > developers ignore Tom. Whut a revoltin' dervelopment. > > Look, the warning idea is provably wrong. Proof is by induction on > users interested in seeing it. The idea of the patch is dubious at > best from the point of view of most users of tla, but the author > clearly doesn't consider that interesting. Same goes for earlier > patches from the same source. The Eight-Ball sez: Outlook cloudy. > > > -- > School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp > University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
