* Ludovic Courtès [2006-02-02 09:51:34 +0100]: > Hi, > > Sergio Gelato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My patch switches to > > using rel_record_nil as the argument list terminator. > > >From a quick grep through the source, this seems to be already fixed, at > least in `libarch' --- except that the thing is called > `rel_record_null'.
Fine. At the time I submitted my patch set (without being aware of the mailing list's message size limit and without expecting the moderator to take quite this long to review my submission) tla 1.3.3 was the latest GNU release. I knew that development was taking place in bazaar, but maybe someone was going to release a 1.3.4 maintenance update. I had originally sent these patches directly to Tom Lord, not knowing that he had stepped down as maintainer a few days earlier; absent an official maintainer for the 1.3 branch, he advised me to send the patches to this list. Unfortunately I don't have time to follow this list closely so I didn't notice the delay. So, has rel_record_nil been renamed to rel_record_null? Or is rel_record_null of a different type, in which case the problem may not have been fixed after all? (Chances are it is indeed fixed, but in order to check that one needs to consider the data type of rel_record_null and the internals of the function being called. Did your "quick grep" include those steps?) _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
