Hi, Sergio Gelato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, has rel_record_nil been renamed to rel_record_null? Or is > rel_record_null of a different type, in which case the problem may not > have been fixed after all? (Chances are it is indeed fixed, but in order > to check that one needs to consider the data type of rel_record_null and > the internals of the function being called. Did your "quick grep" > include those steps?) REL_RECORD_NULL is of type `rel_record'. For instance, if you grep for calls to `rel_add_records ()', you will see that the last argument is now always REL_RECORD_NULL (it used to be a NULL pointer). So I think it's ok. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
