Hi, Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aside from SoC, it might be interesting to think out loud a bit about > the status > of 2.0, though. Hmm.... I'd be interested in hearing what we would expect from an Arch 2.0. I've somewhat given up following the evolution of Free Software DRCS. My last conclusions were that most of the new DRCS, roughly, compared to Arch 1, (i) significantly improved on storage efficiency and access time, but (ii) did not provide remarkable improvements in terms of functionality (one notable exception might be merging). Is this a relevant summary of the situation? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
