Le Jeudi 20 Avril 2006 19:11, Stefan Monnier a écrit : > AFAICT, the patchlogs (in Arch) don't need pruning; they just need a bit of > optimization: > > - drop the log comments, the dates, ... (tla can fetch them from the > archive if needed; I don't know of any case where the speed to get them is > on the critical path). > - use fewer files. > - reduce redundancy. Either manually or via gzip. > - maybe don't even include it in the working dirs, but only in the archives > (where you don't need one per revision but only one per branch or even > one per archive). > > Not all of those are needed: as we'd seen, using a single patchlog file per > branch and gzipping it already gives a factor 10 reduction in disk size; > it's not clear that the rest is even needed. > > > Stefan
What you call a bit of optimization is a new archive format, a new working tree management, your optimizations describe a new product. IMHO Aldrik
pgp1Z7WuOb4RB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
