Thomas Lord writes: > Sorry for the mess but, whatcha gonna do?
Is there a mess? Legally, it's perfectly clear that it's GPLv2-only. The only legal problem is that if a file gets distributed separately from the COPYING file, the recipient has no way of knowing her GPL rights, except to ask the author or a distributor. Big deal, you like getting mail about your code, no? :-) It's only a real problem if you want to delegate decisions about the terms of your license to the FSF. But I thought it was not your intent to do so at that time. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
