"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [1] Equally effective would be to divide COPYING into two parts, the > first part being labelled "The Purpose of the GNU GPL", and the second > being labelled "The GNU General Public License", and containing only > the legally enforceable terms. But this isn't going to happen either.
Why not? Have you asked? -Miles -- `To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
