2009/9/11 Yavor Doganov <ya...@gnu.org> > This discussion is pointless, but anyway... > > Diego Saravia wrote: > > it will be a system incapable of autogenerating its sofware, > > Not if the bugs that are left behind are fixed. Which was the whole > point of my initial comment -- rm'ing is easy, the hard part is to fix > the mess after the rm action. > > For example, the removal of Mesa/GLX in gNewSense was admirable (they > didn't know back then that the FSF is working on resolving the problem > in the best possible way), but it left many packages buggy and/or > useless. Mostly because of lack of manpower; I don't mean to accuse > anyone -- I'm just saying that such things should not be acceptable. > > An imaginary removal of TeX would be far more disastrous. > > >
I agree -- Diego Saravia diego.sara...@gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->d...@unsa.edu.ar
