On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:20:19 +0200 Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote:
> Karl Goetz wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 21:51:51 +0200 > > Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Karl Goetz wrote: > >> - I don't care whether pipes are at the start or end of a line. My > >> "2010-09-10T07:59:01" edit made everything consistent with the > >> majority of entries. It would be nice if we can agree on one style > >> and make it that in one big swoop, because (re-)reflowing according > >> to personal preference detracts from the actual diff. > > > > I find pipes at line end completely bizarre and unnecessarily hard > > to use. If there is agreement on changing them all to line start, > > i'm happy to do the work. > > You have my blessing. :) Done. > >>> [5] is about command-not-found, which appears to work completely > >>> differently in Debian. I've not run it (system too old), but the > >>> problematic files/directories are not included in the package. Can > >>> someone else provide input? > >> It's database is built with update-command-not-found, which > >> extracts its data from Contents-*.gz. Should be OK, I think. > > > > Guess this is not a problem for free distributions. > > Not sure what to add to the wiki page though. it may be a debian > > change to free it up a bit, or it may be an upstream change in how > > the db is made. > > patches/ in the Debian source package doesn't make that change, so I > guess it must be upstream. Perhaps our trisquel friends can try it and check? If not i'll come back to it later for gNS. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
