krt send this to me personally - i will repost On 03/21/2018 03:22 PM, KRT Listmaster wrote: > On 03/21/2018 12:54 PM, bill-auger wrote: > > [...] > >> info - it is not clear though if freeslack or libertybsd have explicitly >> expressed interest - without combing over the history myself, does >> anyone know the history of these on this list? > > Yes, definitely the FreeSlack devs expressed explicit interest on this > list, > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-08/msg00003.html > > and I would say the same for LibertyBSD as well. > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2014-12/msg00002.html > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2015-02/msg00003.html > > thanks, > > - krt >
BTW - the actual OP for free-slack is here: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2016-07/msg00021.html ok thanks krt - those links are pretty convincing - so the real question is "should these be grandfathered into the process and their entries moved from "Distros that have requested consideration" to "Distros currently being evaluated by the community" and have an evaluation results page created for them immediately - or should they be asked to start from the begining of the new protocol by sending email to the GNU webmasters if bypassing the GNU webmasters for these, the new protocol requires at least that each be assigned a community review manager now
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature