Citing from: https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:social_contract
> Hyperbola is free culture: All documentation and > cultural works included in Hyperbola are free > culture, with the exceptions of: works stating a > viewpoint, invariant sections and cover texts. All > documentation and cultural works created by or for > Hyperbola are free culture, with no exceptions. and yes that could not be more clear - this is explicitly making an exception to "free culture" in order to allow GDFL documentation - and saying that any documentation that is made specifically for the hyperbola project will be free culture and presumably with no such invariant sections TBH just as a side note, that precise wording seems to be implying something that was perhaps not intended - the intention here seems quite clearly to be nothing other than to allow for GFDL licensed documentation - the phrases: "works stating a viewpoint, invariant sections and cover texts" are taken straight from the GFDL definition - but in this context they imply that the hyperbola project would not ever be allowed to state any "viewpoint" because all hyperbola documentation is promised to be under a "free culture" license, with no exceptions; but "works stating a viewpoint" are stated explicitly here to be not "free culture" - perhaps that was intended - personally, i would applaud any software project that is dedicated to *not* expressing personal orthogonal "viewpoints" i must say that the hyperbola social contract is written remarkably well in that way as to avoid any normative language - even the section about social behavior is fully prescriptive without being opinionated or judgmental
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
