On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 08:54:23AM +0200, Jean Louis wrote: > > I think there is something seriously wrong with > those people who designed "free culture" to be > "free" to change other people's opinion > statements. > > How can a thought spoken by somebody at one point of > time be modifiable in other point of time, by > other person? It makes no sense as it abuses the > author and proper attribution. It is not ethical. > > That cannot be "free" in the sense of modifications.
In fact, many free software licenses have provisions against misrepresentation of the origin: I can't modify a program and say that it comes from the original authors unchanged; this still doesn't make that program nonfree in the sense of modifications.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
