On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:56:55 -0400 bill-auger wrote: > in fact, it was discussed on this list in 2018
i was wrong about that - it was only mentioned in another related thread - the discussion must have happened on some other list and was forwarded around the main point though, is that it was discussed, and RMS explicitly OK'ed it - maybe something was missed at the time, or maybe something has changed; but no one contested the decision until now
