On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 04:26:54 +0200 Denis wrote: > And as you pointed in another mail, that's already covered as in an > "actively maintained" criteria.
a bit too vaguely though, to capture this "action-ability" concern - uruk would pass most of the criteria transitively via pureos, including "actively maintained"; but it is maintained by another distro, so not "actionable" by the uruk maintainers the FSDG only requires that distros are willing to address freedom bugs - it does not explicitly say that they must be _able_ to - presumably, that "action-ability" was taken for granted (not specified, because it was assumed to always be the case); but in the case of a supplemental spin-off, it is not the case - such distros can only manage the supplemental packages
