[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> yes, that was all denis - he was also the most ardent about finally moving > forward on more of these TPPMs Sorry, I don't know the term "TPPM". You've described a lot of information, but I have trouble understanding it clearly. The text doesn't always say whether it is talking about the standard Docker or the modified Docker. When it describes the modified Docker, it doesn't always state explicitly how that differs from the standard Docker. Remember, I don't know what the standard Docker does! In order for me to see what the modification consists of I need to see description of the standard Docker and the modified Docker in direct contrast. This is going to take more typing than you would need to explain to a person who is familiar with Docker. > generally, a more desirable fix is one that behaves exactly as the standard > tool, without manual user configuration, yet offers libre-only software > selection That seems right to me on general principles, IF there are many free programs that a user could find by looking in the standard Docker site. Are there a lot of containers in the standard Docker site which we can treat as ok for a free system to recommend? That is a crucial question. If the answer is no, we would need to start our own repo from scratch. If the answer is yes, we would wish to find a way to filter the containers in the standard Docker site, but is that doable? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
