On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 02:07:36 -0400 bill-auger <bill-auger@peers.community> wrote: > docker, cargo, pip, npm, many many more - they are all similar enough > for our purpose, to be considers as equivalent competing > implementations of the same misguided use-case: to search for, > download, and install foreign un-vetted software onto your system > > that alone makes them all very ugly and undesirable from the distro's > perspective - all things being equal, we should not need any of them > - they all exist because windows and mac do not have proper package > management; so every programming language established their own According to an academic paper on the topic[1] "Two arguments in defense of language-specific managers are scalability and portability".
The scalability here is precisely what we have a hard time to address with general purpose package managers like the one used in Parabola or even Guix. That same paper from 2019 has some numbers: +---------------+-----------------------+ | Debian | over 59 000 packages | | Maven Central | over 290 000 packages | | RubyGems | over 150 000 packages | +---------------+-----------------------+ So even if we can't add 150 000 packages in Guix like that, there is still a way: In case of R there is a simple (unofficial) software that creates an (unofficial) Guix repository from the R packages. That software is probably easy to modify to create an R repository that excludes nonfree software (R repository licensing is very strict but allows a few specific nonfree licenses). So here we have 3 cases: - Repositories that are 100% free software -> nothing to do. - Repositories that are not 100% free software but have strict licensing -> Can be fixed somehow with the same approach than R. - Repositories with lax licensing information: Very complicated to fix. This also means that while GNU tries to come up with plans to tackle the most difficult cases (like cargo), there is still some room for people to try to fix or find workarounds for the easiest cases in the meantime, especially if it is fast to do. References: ---------- [1]https://hisham.hm/papers/muhammad_2019_taxonomy.pdf Denis.
pgpzRie6nv6SW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
