Actually my impression is that RMS is relatively civilized. It's the people at FSF other than RMS who seem impolite, or evince bizarre ideological views, or get angry in response to perfectly innocent questions. However it does seem that RMS does evade the hard questions when posed.
José Molina wrote:
I think RMS is many times too unpolite in his positions, but without him, who knows what could have happened with the movement? While big corporations try to eat us, the FSF keeps alive the flame of freedom. -----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Goodly Chap Enviado el: Martes, 24 de Mayo de 2005 16:30 Para: gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org Asunto: FSF overly self-important? It occurs to me, there are so many open source projects that are not dependent upon GNU code per se (rightfully so), yet I gather there is a certain arrogance about the FSF, usually observed in direct interaction with them. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
_______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
