Chad writes: > Hmmm ... ok, so I suppose the licensing under the GPL would have to > antedate the "overt act of relinquishment" by which the code is dedicated > to the public domain, since the GPL depends on copyright?
No. Distributing a copy of your work under the GPL is not some kind of global act that forbids you to distribute a different copy under different terms. You own the copyright and can do with it as you wish. If a work is a derivative a work licensed under the GPL (i.e., contains elements of a GPL'd work) _the work as a whole_ may only be licensed under the GPL. Combining a GPL work with a public domain work produces a derivative that may only be distributed under the GPL, but the public domain work remains in the public domain. You can place the portion of the work that is entirely of your authorship in the public domain and simultaneously (or later, or earlier) distribute the combination of your work and a GPL work under the GPL. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
