> The only reason he gave was that only the printed version of the > book was covered by the GFDL and that the content on his web site > is not.
Is there a statement on the Web site (attached in some way to the book) that clearly states that, despite appearances, the book is not licensed under the GFDL? Once again, this has very little relation to the issue. The book, which is represented on the web page, is licensed under the GFDL, the terms of the GFDL apply to the web page as they do to the book. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
