> Are you really disputing the fact that one can combine non-free > work with a GPLed program?
Yes. Then you really ought to read the GPL. Specially the clauses about not being able to put restrictions on a user, i.e. making the software non-free. Is software on my home system that I never distribute proprietary? How should I know what license your software at home is licensed under? If I combine two GPL licensed programs on my system, which I believe you would agree is allowed, does that allow everyone to copy, redistribute, etc? If they hold a copy of the program, yes. Doesn't that suggest to you that maybe this paragraph is not germane to the discussion? I have no idea what you mean by this. Why don't you quote me some language from the license? Surely if the license does not allow me to do what I suggest there would be words in there to point to. Why don't you _read_ the license? Please, just do that instead, the GPL isn't that hard to read. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
