Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> > in "more innovation." >> >> He said nothing of that sort AFAICT, > > Fire a search for "more innovation" in > > http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/WallaceFSFGrantingDismiss.pdf
So your pseudo-quote about "price-fixing at zero" was a plain lie. Thanks for proving my point. He indeed said nothing of that sort. > It's right before "See Jason B. Wacha, Taking the Case: Is the GPL > Enforceable, 21 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech L.J. 451, 487 > (2005)" by Vice President, corporate affairs and General Counsel of > MontaVista Software, which is one of the un-named co-conspirators... > just perfect authority to rely upon for an unbiased court. Stop, they are mostly downstream, so according to your theory they would be prevalently victims of the GPL as it pertains to Linux, not co-conspirators. Who better to rely on than the purportedly harmed party? > "MontaVista provides a commercial-grade Linux-based operating system > and universal development platform." http://www.mvista.com/ Well, you post with a GPLed Usenet reader on a GNU/Linux-run server, so you are obviously also biased. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
