On 2006-03-24, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Merijn de Weerd wrote: > [...] >> You have yet to show that setting a price at zero is predatory >> pricing. > > Wallace on predatory pricing:
Wallace got dismissed because he could not show injury. Without injury there is no antitrust violation. So why are you quoting someone who could not show an antitrust violation to support an allegation of antitrust violation? Please try to write your own response this time, instead of pick-and-choose quotes from losers' briefs. Merijn -- Remove +nospam to reply _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
