> "Although a vertical, maximum-price-fixing agreement is unlawful
   > under 1 of the Sherman Act, it does not cause a competitor
   > antitrust injury unless it results in predatory pricing." --
   > U.S. Supreme Court

   You have yet to show that setting a price at zero is predatory
   pricing. Just selling below cost is not by definition predatory.

He also has to show that the GPL actually sets a fixed price of zero
(or anything else for that matter) for a work.


_______________________________________________
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to