> "Although a vertical, maximum-price-fixing agreement is unlawful > under 1 of the Sherman Act, it does not cause a competitor > antitrust injury unless it results in predatory pricing." -- > U.S. Supreme Court
You have yet to show that setting a price at zero is predatory pricing. Just selling below cost is not by definition predatory. He also has to show that the GPL actually sets a fixed price of zero (or anything else for that matter) for a work. _______________________________________________ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss