"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote: > > > There is actually no good reason that RMAIL omits [attribution > > lines]. > > And the fact that it does is no excuse for their absence. > > People who complain about something non-essential like this should get > a hobby; maybe adding such a feature to RMAIL if it such a thorn in > your eye.
I agree that this extra bit of evidence highlighting your moronity is not really something essential... but hey what makes you think that people who complain don't have a hobby already (with zero interest in regards to fixing RMS' antics like RMAIL)? regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
