"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I use vim on some systems, nvi on others; the latter is a direct > descendant of the original vi. > > nvi is not in anyway a direct descendant of vi, it shares nothing with > it other than how it behaves, much like vim. nvi is a complete > reimplementation of vi since vi was (and maybe still is) non-free > software at the time. nvi was in turn based on elvis, which was a > free clone of vi.
It appears that you're correct. Thank you. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst> San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst> We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
