"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Not all free software is commercial. > > > > All free software must be commercial, anyone can charge a fee for > > the act of distributing it. > > I recommend you look up the difference between "must" and "can" in > a dictionary of your choice. > > And I suggest you look up the definition of free software, if you > cannot charge a fee for something, then it is not free software.
But software does not become commercial just because you _can_ charge for it. By that reckoning, all sex would be commercial. > Thus, it must be commercial, since you can always charge a fee if > you so choose to. When you are done reading the dictionary, an introductory text on logic might be useful next. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
