> And I suggest you look up the definition of free software, if you > cannot charge a fee for something, then it is not free software.
But software does not become commercial just because you _can_ charge for it. By that reckoning, all sex would be commercial. If sex could be copied like software, then you might have a point. > Thus, it must be commercial, since you can always charge a fee if > you so choose to. When you are done reading the dictionary, an introductory text on logic might be useful next. Again, you instead of providing sound arguments, you resort to silly name calling. Could you please stop that? It is quite disgusting to see such a behaviour from a fellow peer. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
