Sonny! Uncle Hasler has spoken! John Hasler wrote: > > David Kastrup writes: > > An "illegal document"? Well, I've heard quite a few weird attacks on the > > GPL, but this is the first time I see someone suspecting it to be > > pornography or similar. > > Well, the doofuses at SCO claimed GPLv2 was "unconstitutional". The phrase > "illegal document" doesn't make a whole lot of sense, though, at least > under US law.
http://supreme.justia.com/us/38/157/case.html "a void, useless, and illegal document" regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
