David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sonny! Uncle Hasler has spoken! > > > > John Hasler wrote: > >> > >> David Kastrup writes: > >> > An "illegal document"? Well, I've heard quite a few weird attacks on the > >> > GPL, but this is the first time I see someone suspecting it to be > >> > pornography or similar. > >> > >> Well, the doofuses at SCO claimed GPLv2 was "unconstitutional". The phrase > >> "illegal document" doesn't make a whole lot of sense, though, at least > >> under US law. > > > > http://supreme.justia.com/us/38/157/case.html > > > > "a void, useless, and illegal document" > > I should hope that you can come up with something better than a > verdict from 1839
It just shows that I can do better than Eben The Historian, your GNU Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda: http://dartreview.com/archives/2005/04/08/intellectual_property_is_so_last_year.php "an investigation of Oliver Wendell Holmes' "The Path of the Law," published in 1897, which was our assigned reading for the week. " LOL. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss