>Again, no, it is to keep said software free. The GPL does not >require you to distribute; if it did, you'd have a point, but it >doesn't. If the goal of the GNU GPL was to create a larger pool >of free software, then the GNU GPL would require _all_ >modifications to become public, but it doesn't, you are not >required to distribute your hacks.
So you believe that's not the goal of the GPL simply because the miniscule percentage of code that's never distributed isn't required to be distributed? No, because the GNU GPL says so, so do all the wonderful essays on www.gnu.org. I suggest that you read them. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
