[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In the sacred domain of comp.os.linux.advocacy, > Dustin Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didnst hastily scribble thusly: > >> Go back to stealing and end up behind bars. > > > Intellectual copyright infringement isn't theft. > > > > It's no use y'know... > It's like talking to a brick wall.
Hey spike number one, why don't you simply admit that you're illegal file-sharer and then I'll report you to <http://www.fact-uk.org.uk/>? You could then argue with FACT (Federation Against Copyright Theft) folks and their friends from <http://www.met.police.uk/> how it is actually "non-theft" and "doesn't hurt anyone". Deal? regards, alexander. -- "Notwithstanding Jacobsen's confused discussion of unilateral contracts, bilateral contracts, implied licenses, "licenses to the world" and "bare" licenses in his Appellant's Brief, the issue at hand is fairly simple." -- Brief of Appellees (CAFC 2008-1001). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
