In the sacred domain of comp.os.linux.advocacy, Tony Drudge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> didnst hastily scribble thusly: >> Why should I? Just to give you points in a pointless argument? >> My argument is simply what I've been stating for this entire thread. That >> copyright infringement is not theft. BECAUSE it IS NOT THEFT. >> IT IS COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
> I guess that's why federal law enforcement (FBI) gets involved because it's > only minor "copyright infringement" and not a a real crime. You will of course now reference the place in this thread where I stated it wasn't a "real crime"? FFS, I just said AGAIN that it was a crime in the very article you quoted. Did I say it was an unreal crime, or a petty crime or any other type of crime? Didn't think so. I just used the word by itself. Crime. >> Two completely DIFFERENT *CRIMES* >> Get that? It's a crime, I never stated that it was not a crime. > Fine. Call it what you want. But it IS a CRIME and it is illegal. And > people who pirate movies and music are breaking the law. Where did I ever say otherwise? >> Just as identity theft is NOT THEFT. >> It is fraud. Another entirely different CRIME. > Still illegal so why do you and your ilk continue to defend it. Where have I defended it? Hmmm? I simply called it what it is. Not what the media WANT it to be. -- ______________________________________________________________________________ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | |Andrew Halliwell BSc(hons)| "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't | | in | suck is probably the day they start making | | Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
