In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is most plausible that the defendants simply said to the SFLC, > "Dismiss or we will file a Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss" and collect our > attorney fees and costs. Even an incompetent defense attorney would > know that the SFLC pleadings are defective on their face due to lack > of Copyright Office registration of the allegedly infringed works. > The lack of a public settlement stipulation by both parties > reinforces this scenario.
Yet the source then appeared, which is what SFLC wanted. -- --Tim Smith _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
