[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Jun 27, 12:02 am, rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > They argue that we wouldn't 'distribute' the program so that the GPL >> > requirements won't hold. >> >> Whether you distribute or not, the GPL requirements won't hold under U.S. > > Do I understand you correctly, that in the U.S. we could ignore all > GPL statements? I'm sorry, it's hard for me to get what your > explanations imply, and we have no legal department to ask for help.
That's the gist of his statements and has always been here. He is a troll, so you'll likely get quite a better view of the situation even by just reading the GPL text front to back. > Please pretend to speak to a 6-year old, as I'm a stupid software > developer, not a lawyer ;-) He pretends to speak _like_ a 6-year old, so this should not be a problem. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
