On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:31:50 -0400, Hyman Rosen wrote: > I guess that the plaintiffs decided that having the manufacturer of the > routers comply with the GPL was good enough for them, because it would > be difficult to explain in court that Verizon was not complying with the > GPL given this availability. But that's just a guess.
If it's an action tek router, sold to an importer exporter, and then to another middleman, and then to a retailer, to whom do you go for the source code? presumably, just action tek. Dunno if that totally applies here, but seems reasonable. -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
