"David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
"amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes:
"Sermo Malifer" <[email protected]> wrote:
If that were true we'd all still be running Word Perfect on CP/M!
Again you miss the obvious. If Word were not orders of magnitude more
useful and capable than WordPerfect on CP/M, we might still be using
WordPerfect albeit on Vista. But that is not the case and WordPerfect
is dead as a dodo.
AFAIR, WordPerfect on CP/M was particularly useless because it did not
even exist. As opposed to, say, WordStar on CP/M.
I think you are correct. But the point is valid even if you substitute
WordPerfect on MS-DOS.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
