Rjack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
The GPL is a legal delusion in Richard Stallman's marxist mind.
It seems to be a solid enough delusion that Microsoft was very
careful to make sure that its code would not fall under that
license.
Why would Microsoft ever want to give away their intellectual
property under a voidable contract like the GPL?
Duh.
Microsoft issues licenses which explicitly mention (to exclude) the GPL.
See
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/04/17/microsoft_antigpl_fine_print_threatens/>.
If they fear it, it's more than a "legal delusion".
Oh, and the GPL is neither voidable nor a contract.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
