Rjack wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> Rjack wrote: >>> The voidable, preempted provision of the GPL is section >> > 2(b)'s modify-and-distribute term. Please demonstrate >> > where Microsoft has modified-and-distributed GPL licensed code. >> >> Please demonstrate where anyone has used your (incorrect) >> legal theories to openly and successfully violate the terms >> of the GPL. > > There is no need. All GPL suits end in voluntary dismissal. > You need only say no to SFLC or FSF demands and you'll > receive a voluntary dismissal. The official court records -- > the only records that count -- confirm this fact. >
The official court records say that you are full of it -- The chief cause of problems is solutions _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
