Rjack wrote:
> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>> Rjack wrote:
>>> There is no need. All GPL suits end in voluntary dismissal.
>>
>> And afterwards, all companies who were sued make the source
>> code available as the GPL requires. No one is distributing
>> GPLed code, modified or not, in open violation of the GPL as
>> you (incorrectly) state may be done. (Verizon uses an
>> "actiontec gateway" URL to distribute firmware whose sources
>> are made available by Actiontec.)
>
> Argument by false cause is unpersuasive and unverifiable:
> "The sun goes down because we've turned on the street lights"
> holds the same credibility.
>
> It is a verifiable fact that ever completed suit filed by the SFLC
> was terminated by the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal. Just show us
> the legal documents.
>
Repeating your bullshit does not make it true. You are quite simply a liar,
nothing else
--
Microsoft's Guide To System Design:
Let it get in YOUR way. The problem for your problem.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
