In article <[email protected]>, "amicus_curious" <[email protected]> wrote: > What is at issue today, though, is the nature of such "default copyright > rules". If there is no fee charged to use the work or to redistribute the > work, the copyright can be ignored unless the author can show some degree of > harm to himself.
Where did you get that idea? Not from the copyright statute, nor from the case law. -- --Tim Smith _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
