After takin' a swig o' grog, David Kastrup belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> "amicus_curious" <[email protected]> writes: > >> "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> >> >>> Since when? If I send a personal letter to someone, I don't charge a >>> fee for it. He still is not authorized for redistributing my letter or >>> using its content in publications of his. >>> >> I don't see where that has any bearing on the issue, whether it is >> true or not. If you send me a letter, I think that I am free to show >> it to anyone as I see fit. > > Sure. Fair use. You are also allowed to show and lend a book you > acquired to anybody you want to as you see fit. But you are not > authorized to make additional copies and send them around. > >> Any set of words on a piece of paper do not qualify as a "unique >> expression, fixed in a media". > > They don't? Apparently, amicus is only ignorant, as opposed to the liar Rjack. He doesn't know that his own word here are automatically copyrighted. -- May be too intense for some viewers. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
