7 wrote:
As I write the assembler code for how a switch statement is implemented,
then I have copyright over it no matter how it gets subsequently used.
The assembler code for the switch statement is not generated
'automatically'. The exact sequence is something I have to creatively
interpret and put together reading CPU specification.
Nonsense.
The structural semantics of a "switch" statement are dictated by the
programming language specification. The the implementation of that
structure is dictated by the CPU specification.
So what's so original about that?
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
