Rjack wrote: > 7 wrote: > >> >> As I write the assembler code for how a switch statement is implemented, >> then I have copyright over it no matter how it gets subsequently used. >> The assembler code for the switch statement is not generated >> 'automatically'. The exact sequence is something I have to creatively >> interpret and put together reading CPU specification. > > Nonsense. > > The structural semantics of a "switch" statement are dictated by the > programming language specification. The the implementation of that > structure is dictated by the CPU specification.
Wrong fool. You don't know any assembler coding. > So what's so original about that? If you knew assembler you wouldn't ask. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss