Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <[email protected]> writes:
Some might think it wise to use terms not specific to US law for
software that will get worldwide propagation. Please explain
why you seem to disagree.
Attempting to use a license for worldwide "propagation" (presumably
for one vast World Socialist Order) under disparate legal
jurisdictions is the ultimate folly ...
But this doesn't explain why you seem to think that the license
should use US-specific language.
One tactic of trolling is to endlessly ask "why" questions
especially concerning other's motivations. Perhaps you should simply
state your reasons "why" I shouldn't prefer US-specific language.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
